[identity profile] noluck-boston.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] vintageads
I remember these as being sponsors of game shows in the 1970's.

Long stemmed beauties

Date: 2012-10-22 05:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pikkewyntjie.livejournal.com
Wow. $18.99 for non-designer shoes in 1968? That seems expensive. Maybe they could have the shoes made in some country with plenty of cheap labor. What could possibly go wrong?

Date: 2012-10-22 05:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mystical-chickn.livejournal.com
Wow, I think I just barely remember Kinney shoes.

Date: 2012-10-22 07:43 pm (UTC)
kshandra: A cross-stitch sampler in a gilt frame, plainly stating "FUCK CANCER" (Boot)
From: [personal profile] kshandra
Hee! My father was a salesman for Kinney when I was a kid.

Date: 2012-10-22 07:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jocelmeow.livejournal.com
Ah! Actual stacked heels! Sometime in the last ten years or so, stacked heels came back in, except for this time they're not stacked, they're just painted to look stacked, even on some pretty expensive brands (Fluevogs come to mind). I've refused to buy any of them because they look so cheap and tatty to me compared to real stacked heels. I am a fashion curmudgeon.

Date: 2012-10-22 08:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-warina.livejournal.com
Even though the shoe is not beautiful, her legs are =)

Date: 2012-10-23 01:30 am (UTC)
ext_534229: (magikist)
From: [identity profile] john-holton.livejournal.com
That they are.

Date: 2012-10-22 11:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mellzie-1963.livejournal.com
The style of this ad looks more like it would be 1978 than 1968. But I don't know if they were doing anything but Ken Berry's ads for The Great Amerian Shoe Store (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trKmk8eGCwM) at that point.

Date: 2012-10-22 11:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lightning-rose.livejournal.com

I was thinking the dress looks much more disco era than late 60's. I remember owning a similar dress in the late 70's.

Edit: I asked the photo owner on flickr if it might be mislabelled.

Edited Date: 2012-10-23 12:05 am (UTC)

Date: 2012-10-23 01:38 am (UTC)
ext_534229: (magikist)
From: [identity profile] john-holton.livejournal.com
It has to be mislabeled. Women didn't wear shoes, dresses, or makeup like this in the late Sixties. Plus, their logo was different in 1968. Must be from the Seventies.

Date: 2012-10-23 03:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jocelmeow.livejournal.com
Agreed...I was second-guessing the date too, but thought maybe I was mistaken.

Date: 2012-10-25 02:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wings-unfurling.livejournal.com
I want the heels she's wearing.

And I want REAL stacked heels. Not the stupid painted / stuck on / whatever is passing for stacked heels nowadays. #purist

Profile

vintageads: (Default)
Vintage Ads

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819 202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 19th, 2025 11:58 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios