[identity profile] wrascalism.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] vintageads
It has the motor in the rear...where it should be!

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Date: 2008-07-06 07:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] albear.livejournal.com
Damn! a 1963 car with 4 wheel disc brakes? and a Renault?

Date: 2008-07-06 04:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] baron-waste.livejournal.com

56Renault750Back.jpg - is a maddeningly small image.

40 MPG?

Date: 2008-07-06 06:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hayce.livejournal.com
They claim a car from 1963 can get up to 40 miles per gallon? I find that very hard to believe. Was the mile shorter back then? Or the gallon larger?

Date: 2008-07-21 03:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jckmnpa.livejournal.com
I love the kids in the back... Not only un-seat belted but facing the wrong way. I know not using belts was more common then but the pic just cracks me up. They look like floating heads.

Profile

vintageads: (Default)
Vintage Ads

October 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627 28293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 2nd, 2026 01:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios