Page Summary
shortsweetcynic.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ejia-arath03.livejournal.com - (no subject)
voo-04.livejournal.com - (no subject)
shortsweetcynic.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sid - (no subject)
fallconsmate.livejournal.com - (no subject)
meezergal.livejournal.com - (no subject)
e-d-young.livejournal.com - (no subject)
doylescordy.livejournal.com - (no subject)
leaf-collector.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pikkewyntjie.livejournal.com - (no subject)
weelisa.livejournal.com - (no subject)
frambreliza.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cheesygirl.livejournal.com - (no subject)
tfcocs.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags

no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 07:35 pm (UTC)in sickness and in health indeed. <3
no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 07:43 pm (UTC)Dammit make it get better and I will buy all the batteries you want
no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 08:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 09:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 10:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 10:22 pm (UTC)yes
Date: 2012-12-11 12:02 am (UTC)Because people were not as emotionally attached to their pets are they are today.
I mean, after all...sick dog in a shed?
There is also a bit of 'populist' propaganda in here as well because most people were rural, and populism was a hit with the dog-on-the-shed populous. This is a pure practical message, back in the day.
Because of the depth of message, I vote YES.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 11:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-11 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-11 12:05 am (UTC)Awww
no subject
Date: 2012-12-11 01:03 am (UTC)YES
no subject
Date: 2012-12-11 02:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-11 03:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-11 04:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-11 08:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-21 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-12 04:31 pm (UTC)