Page Summary
xcarex.livejournal.com - (no subject)
leaf-collector.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cuddyclothes.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nyxalinth.livejournal.com - (no subject)
purplesquirrel.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ejia-arath03.livejournal.com - (no subject)
moem - (no subject)
1geek-queen.livejournal.com - (no subject)
plumtreeblossom.livejournal.com - (no subject)
man-of-snows.livejournal.com - (no subject)
mackinzie.livejournal.com - (no subject)
urbantravels.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags

no subject
Date: 2012-05-25 09:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-25 10:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-25 09:50 pm (UTC)But more on topic, I get the ad is for shoe polish (and raincoat polish, I guess), but I don't understand why she has to be nekkid, they could have gotten the point across wearing a simple cotton dress or something. ;-;
interesting ad, tho.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-25 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-26 05:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-25 10:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-25 11:28 pm (UTC)Nekkid =/= shoe polish, yes, we know that.
Try this one:
Nekkid = Guys pay attention, look several times, show it to friends, "pin up", driving home the next equation:
Griffin shoe polish = Pleasure = Buy some of that next time you need shoe polish = Sales go up
no subject
Date: 2012-05-26 12:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-27 09:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-26 02:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-26 05:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-26 07:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-26 08:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-26 11:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-26 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-26 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-26 05:20 pm (UTC)Also hadn't heard of Cordovan before. Neat.
Really surprised they were able to get away with her being practically naked under there.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-30 05:08 pm (UTC)But shoe polish? What's the connection? How did shoe polish ads become a refuge for blatant ASSOCIATE OUR PRODUCT WITH SEX?
I also wonder where these ads actually ran: I don't think they were exactly in the Saturday Evening Post. Police Gazette maybe?