i love this. and i feel like the whole thing is a veiled reference to puberty, and buying these as a "Congrats! You're bleeding from the crotch!" gift.
Seems like I missed so much, growing up with Leggs pantyhose...
On the one hand, this ad makes me bristle because it's really pretty sexist, but on the other hand, it's just so...romantic...in a way I can't explain.
Then, too, it's a little creepy to talk about a young girl wearing garters...if I was a dad, I think I'd be a little weirded out, having that image put into my head.
Well, it's not like there was an alternative... Of course underwear must always have had an erotic charge, but stockings wouldn't have had the almost fetishy connotations they do now. (Although it very carefully doesn't mention garters.
I also suspect that the ad would have run in a women's magazine, so dad probably wouldn't have seen it at all - the copy definitely feels to me as if it's aimed at mothers specifically (it talks about 'your legs').
Garters and stockings being sexy is a recent thing, since the advent of panythose.
Personally if I'm going to wear something sheer (as opposed to tights) I prefer stockings with a garter belt, but that's because I hate the sensation of sitting down in nylon. I get all sweaty in places I just do not like being sweaty. Even when it comes to tights, I've moved from nylon to more natural fibers whenever possible.
Heh. Looking at the date, I must admit my first thought was of all those young women in Britain, drawing fake seams on their calves before they went out dancing, because you couldn't get nylons, never mind silk.*
Great ad!
* Barring the black market and/ or an American boyfriend, but there wouldn't have been many of them about in 1942, either....
The socks of girlhood are comfortable and washable. The silk stockings of life are delicate, impractical, and a constant reminder that she can't climb trees with the boys anymore, because she now has to please them, rather than being friends with them.
I do believe this is the most wonderful ad I've seen to market a product at a 'coming of age' demographic. Feminist concerns aside, it's just visually lovely and the copy is sweet and dreamy.
Its interesting how nowadays people would look at this as more condemnation rather the celebration in a sort of "its aaaaall down hill from here girls, you'll get engaged, get married, and evenually DIE."sense if you will.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-06 11:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-06 01:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-06 02:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-06 11:57 am (UTC)*daha*
no subject
Date: 2012-01-06 12:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-07 01:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-06 12:58 pm (UTC)YES
Date: 2012-01-06 02:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-06 02:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-06 02:53 pm (UTC)YES
Date: 2012-01-06 02:54 pm (UTC)Seems like I missed so much, growing up with Leggs pantyhose...
On the one hand, this ad makes me bristle because it's really pretty sexist, but on the other hand, it's just so...romantic...in a way I can't explain.
Then, too, it's a little creepy to talk about a young girl wearing garters...if I was a dad, I think I'd be a little weirded out, having that image put into my head.
This is a great ad, though.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-06 03:20 pm (UTC)I also suspect that the ad would have run in a women's magazine, so dad probably wouldn't have seen it at all - the copy definitely feels to me as if it's aimed at mothers specifically (it talks about 'your legs').
Re: YES
Date: 2012-01-07 01:48 am (UTC)Personally if I'm going to wear something sheer (as opposed to tights) I prefer stockings with a garter belt, but that's because I hate the sensation of sitting down in nylon. I get all sweaty in places I just do not like being sweaty. Even when it comes to tights, I've moved from nylon to more natural fibers whenever possible.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-06 03:22 pm (UTC)Great ad!
* Barring the black market and/ or an American boyfriend, but there wouldn't have been many of them about in 1942, either....
no subject
Date: 2012-01-06 05:16 pm (UTC)The "her new legs" bit made me imagine they just bought a new pair of legs for her to attach to her body.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-06 10:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-07 02:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-08 03:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-07 04:27 am (UTC)I mean, I did, but were it a current ad... no.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-07 12:17 pm (UTC)YES
Date: 2012-01-08 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-08 03:04 am (UTC)please tell me I'm not the only pervert >_>
no subject
Date: 2012-01-09 05:25 am (UTC)...be curious about that little thing called sex.