The photo is more than likely tinted, given the uniformity of color on the skin and the harness & fittings. Photos could be and often were manipulated even 'back in the day' before anyone had dreamed of computers.
It depends. You *do* know that for the wizard of oz, they tinted the "horse of a different color" with jello powder, right? (actually several horses, there was more than one color)
For a still photograph, it would be relatively easy to tint one portion of the print. You can see this in very old photographs that have been hand-tinted by the photographer, in the days before color film.
And in the days before stringent laws in the US, performing animals were not often treated well, which is why the elephant could have looked unhappy...or just was in a bad mood that day.
yes
Date: 2011-06-04 03:09 am (UTC)Re: yes
Date: 2011-06-04 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-04 03:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-04 04:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-04 08:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-04 05:25 pm (UTC)For a still photograph, it would be relatively easy to tint one portion of the print. You can see this in very old photographs that have been hand-tinted by the photographer, in the days before color film.
And in the days before stringent laws in the US, performing animals were not often treated well, which is why the elephant could have looked unhappy...or just was in a bad mood that day.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-04 04:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-04 11:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-04 01:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-05 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-04 06:03 pm (UTC)yes
Date: 2011-06-05 04:46 pm (UTC)