Page Summary
whoseline_wlsc - (no subject)
year-anda-day.livejournal.com - (no subject)
murakozi.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fledgist.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pikkewyntjie.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sunshinesarah.livejournal.com - (no subject)
herbadness.livejournal.com - (no subject)
loreamara.livejournal.com - (no subject)
emmuzka.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ejia-arath03.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags

no subject
Date: 2011-05-26 02:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-26 05:30 am (UTC)Maybe the ad agency was stoned? It looks like the sixties to me.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-26 10:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-26 12:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-26 12:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-28 01:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-26 01:25 pm (UTC)To me there's a cannabalistic quality to this ad, especially since this is obviously from the 60s when it was hip to co-opt the British term "bird" for girl. Then again, maybe it's supposed to be a psychosexual thing as if the woman is suggesting "you can eat me, too, you know."
And I agree with other posters that somebody was on something and really had the munchies!
no subject
Date: 2011-05-26 03:27 pm (UTC)But I'm still totally confused overall.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-27 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-27 11:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-26 03:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-26 05:53 pm (UTC)All I can think is how uncomfortable it would be to wear polyester double knit in a hot kitchen. There was way too much of that stuff around well into the 70s and I was forced to wear far too much of it as a kid. :P
no subject
Date: 2011-05-26 05:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-26 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-26 07:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-27 06:23 am (UTC)