[identity profile] bitterlawngnome.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] vintageads


LIFE, 1949 (exact date unknown).

1949 model. Air conditioned, all-metal construction, 6.5 feet wide and shoulder high, with enough room inside for the seats to fold down into a double bed. And it got 25 MPG, under ideal conditions. Let's compare that to a Hummer, circa 2009, doing maybe 20 MPG ...

We don't *deserve* jetpacks.

Date: 2010-09-21 09:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] talonvaki.livejournal.com
Damn.

I want one of these! Screw SUVs...this is awesome.

Date: 2010-09-21 09:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] talonvaki.livejournal.com
Oh, hell yes.

I mean, LOOK at it! It's the greatest thing that's ever happened to automobiles!

It's unmarred by fender openings! I don't even know what that means, but I WANT IT!
Edited Date: 2010-09-21 09:47 pm (UTC)

Date: 2010-09-21 09:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beetle-breath.livejournal.com
I love the type, the way it mimics a speeding car.

Date: 2012-11-08 10:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badgerpdx.livejournal.com
Agreed. Vintage fonts rule! (although I do actually quite love Hevetica: It's what I grew up with...)

Date: 2010-09-21 10:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] weelisa.livejournal.com
We don't *deserve* jetpacks

We don't deserve Tang, for that matter...

Date: 2010-09-21 10:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] weelisa.livejournal.com
We don't deserve astronauts! ;p

Date: 2010-09-21 11:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pseydtonne.livejournal.com
Actually, we don't deserve cosmonauts. They're made from great stock.

Yuri Gagarin was a poet AND a test pilot. He wrote a beautiful description of what he saw while he was making the first human orbit of the Earth as part of the first human trip into outer space.

He died doing what he loved: testing experimental aircraft. They just don't make pioneers like that anymore.

They also don't make sweet Nashes anymore.

-beep beep

Date: 2010-09-22 01:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] weelisa.livejournal.com
Believe it or not, I'm off to google the poetry of Yuri Gagarin...

Date: 2010-09-21 10:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zorinlynx.livejournal.com
And the sort of accident where you'd just get out of your car and curse out the other driver in today's cars would be lethal in this one.

Thank you but I'd rather take modern safety and crash survivability any day. :)

Date: 2010-09-21 11:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pseydtonne.livejournal.com
Buh-but... chrome!

Date: 2010-09-21 11:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] christhawk.livejournal.com
There's no reason they couldn't engineer a car with side airbags AND a double bed, is there? :)

Date: 2010-09-22 02:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badgerpdx.livejournal.com
2009 Chevy Malibu vs. 1959 Chevy Bel Air in offset frontal crash:

You are quite right.

Date: 2010-09-22 05:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pseydtonne.livejournal.com
That was educational, yet it was also great crash pr0n. Thanks!

Date: 2010-09-22 06:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badgerpdx.livejournal.com
Hey, I was REALLY suprised at the result. I would have expected the 59 to hold up much better than that. I figured it was heavier and the metal gauge would have been thicker: I thought it would have pushed the Malibu around but the passengers in the newer car would have fared much better. They did, obviously, but I didn't expect the passenger compartment of the 59 to be so affected.

Date: 2010-09-22 12:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mhkrabat.livejournal.com
...and the styling of this Nash and all others up to the mid 1960s was penned by Batista "Pinin" Farina, who later had his surname changed to "Pininfarina". He also lent styling to Ferrari, Maserati and a number of others. I didn't "get" these cars when I was a kid, now they're mostly about as plenty as hen's teeth and I love them!

Date: 2010-09-22 11:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mhkrabat.livejournal.com
As a buff of railroading in the 20th century, I've carelessly charted the progress of design and style. It was a natural that this school would include automotive works in the portfolio. The method came to make such work a day things as steam locomotives and trucks appear stylish yet remain workhorses. See it stretch out to include things like phones, toasters and blenders was fun.

Date: 2010-09-22 06:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wrascalism.livejournal.com
Actually....

It was the body after this one in 1952 that was based on a Farina design. The one in the ad was designed in-house.

(I read a lot of Collectible Automobile magazines.
:o)

Date: 2010-09-22 11:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mhkrabat.livejournal.com
Well! Now that's very interesting to me. My impression of this m/y car is that Farina played on it's fine lines and made them his own, taking them and distributing that look to other makes as well as maintaining the family likeness that Nash and Rambler had for years. There are Fiats in the late 50s and early 60s that strongly resemble Ramblers.

Date: 2010-09-22 12:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] janenx01.livejournal.com
I deserve a jetpack.

That said, this car is amazing.

Date: 2010-09-22 02:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badgerpdx.livejournal.com
Really! Mister Wickham.

Date: 2010-09-22 02:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badgerpdx.livejournal.com
My father remembers his father having one and driving all over in it. They would sleep in the car, save $$$ on hotel bills. I suppose they did it at rest-stops so they could use the rest rooms to wash up.

Date: 2010-09-22 03:35 am (UTC)

Date: 2010-09-22 03:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meig.livejournal.com
Did Cadillac come from the old Nash line? That badge certainly looks pretty Cadillac-ish.

Date: 2010-09-22 06:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wrascalism.livejournal.com
Nash and Hudson merged in 1954 to become American Motors...then gained success with the Rambler, Javelin, Pacer and Jeep and Eagle 4-wheel drives.

Date: 2010-09-22 06:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dubhain.livejournal.com
Correct. Nash and GM don't share any significant automotive DNA. GM's founder, William C. "Billy" Durant did try to buy Ford, in 1907, but the deal fell through when Henry Ford wanted to be paid in cash and the bankers didn't have enough faith in Durant to approve the loan. Durant, who already controlled Buick, started General Motors the next year.

Nash (actually Nash-Kelvinator) and Hudson Motor Car Company merged to become AMC, as [livejournal.com profile] wrascalbc mentions above. When AMC folded, Chrysler picked-up the pieces, before it was in turn Pac-Manned by Daimler-Benz (think Mercedes-Benz.) Then Daimler-Benz coughed-up Chrysler like a hairball, and it was bought-out by Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. Chrysler is now in process of being acquired by Fiat. Mostly because Fiat wants Chrysler's U.S. distribution network, from what I've heard. (This after a failed deal with GM in which GM paid Fiat two billion USD to get out of. Ironically, there's now talk of Fiat taking over GM Europe.)

So, Nash is now Chrysler, and soon to be Fiat. More or less. Ironically, it was Chrysler who started the whole automotive 'streamlining' fad in the first place, with the 1934 Airflow.

Date: 2010-09-22 05:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bernthewitch.livejournal.com
I was going to comment with some wildly thought up witty thing, but y'all beat me to it.

*dies ded from comment lol*

Profile

vintageads: (Default)
Vintage Ads

May 2026

S M T W T F S
      12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 5th, 2026 05:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios