Not exactly. I don't know how you could compare rates of enjoyment of being outdoors with now. And you're not considering the poorer sort of people who wouldn't have a heck of a lot of time for cavorting, just the same as today. And, you know, the Great Depression.
There were fewer prepared foods, yes.
But then they also had a whole lot of diseases and illnesses that medicine couldn't deal with. Polio, rickets, scarlet fever, infections, tuberculosis, occupational hazards. Refrigerators were a luxury.
It's not quite "things were great back in the day." Life expectancy was 59.7 years in the 30s vs 77.8 in 2005.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Depression_in_the_United_States -- note some of the estimates of malnourished children under "Facts and Figures")
Anyway, fat does not necessarily equate poor health, much as thinness doesn't necessarily mean good health.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 03:15 am (UTC)There were fewer prepared foods, yes.
But then they also had a whole lot of diseases and illnesses that medicine couldn't deal with. Polio, rickets, scarlet fever, infections, tuberculosis, occupational hazards. Refrigerators were a luxury.
It's not quite "things were great back in the day." Life expectancy was 59.7 years in the 30s vs 77.8 in 2005.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Depression_in_the_United_States -- note some of the estimates of malnourished children under "Facts and Figures")
Anyway, fat does not necessarily equate poor health, much as thinness doesn't necessarily mean good health.