[identity profile] rainbow-goddess.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] vintageads


I dunno. If they want to keep their slim figures, maybe they shouldn't be drinking Coke.

Date: 2010-08-03 03:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seamonkey-mags.livejournal.com
Not exactly. I don't know how you could compare rates of enjoyment of being outdoors with now. And you're not considering the poorer sort of people who wouldn't have a heck of a lot of time for cavorting, just the same as today. And, you know, the Great Depression.

There were fewer prepared foods, yes.

But then they also had a whole lot of diseases and illnesses that medicine couldn't deal with. Polio, rickets, scarlet fever, infections, tuberculosis, occupational hazards. Refrigerators were a luxury.

It's not quite "things were great back in the day." Life expectancy was 59.7 years in the 30s vs 77.8 in 2005.

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Depression_in_the_United_States -- note some of the estimates of malnourished children under "Facts and Figures")

Anyway, fat does not necessarily equate poor health, much as thinness doesn't necessarily mean good health.

Profile

vintageads: (Default)
Vintage Ads

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819 202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 24th, 2025 03:29 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios