(deleted comment)

Date: 2009-09-12 02:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] amelia-eve.livejournal.com
I suspect we'll be hearing it soon on some newborn out of Hollywood.

Date: 2009-09-11 01:02 am (UTC)

Date: 2009-09-11 01:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bolddeciever.livejournal.com
If you have only two items, a numbered list is really underwhelming.

Date: 2009-09-11 06:38 am (UTC)

Date: 2009-09-11 02:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nonentityb.livejournal.com
They're addictive!

Date: 2009-09-11 03:21 am (UTC)

Date: 2009-09-11 06:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] randomneses.livejournal.com
yeah, they really do look like ritz

Date: 2009-09-11 06:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] randomneses.livejournal.com
Crack...in a box.

Date: 2009-09-11 09:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nosyparker.livejournal.com
3. ???
4. Profit!

Date: 2009-09-11 02:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thehappycat.livejournal.com
Somehow I don't particularly associate the word "educator" with tasty crackers. Perhaps this lack of association is why we don't see this brand in stores anymore.

Date: 2009-09-15 05:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hemlock-martini.livejournal.com
I read "This is the most imitated cracker in America" as "This is the most irritated cracker in America" and I immediately shouted "NO! THAT IS UNTRUE! I AM THE MOST IRRITATED CRACKER IN AMERICA!" Because it is an emphatically correct fact of logic.

Then I re-read it and I decided to go watch the news again and get more irritated.

Profile

vintageads: (Default)
Vintage Ads

October 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627 28293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 2nd, 2026 06:13 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios