Between this and the ads we've seen for another shortening (Spry or something like that?) I'm wondering what the deal was with 'indigestible' food back then.
In the light of what we now know about trans fats, it makes me wonder what current health arguments turn out to be straight out lies in the future. I'm betting on "Non-fat is healthy" and "the more fiber the better!"
To be honest, it's only been two years since I realised Crisco was some sort of vegetable shortening. All the years before that, the only Crisco I knew of was the one Calvin (Calvin and Hobbes) used to style his hair with. I've never been able to find Crisco digestible since.
I'm actually amazed by how edible these things are compared to other foods that have been suggested in ads. No lime Jell-o in sight. I'd eat those potato boats, even if I have no idea what creamed meat is supposed to be. Can't be all bad, right?
Okay what exactly is the definition of "digestible" that we are supposed to assume in this context? I'm confused. Does animal shortening make you fart more than vegetable shortening or something?
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
LOL
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I'm 20 ._____.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Re: Just sayin'
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)