http://mermaidshotel.livejournal.com/ (
mermaidshotel.livejournal.com) wrote in
vintageads2008-03-14 10:05 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
mod note
if i'm terse and cranky-sounding in this entry, i apologise.
i'm just going to shorten names to A and S, because we know them already
1. A's comment - "I can't help but notice you belong to an LJ community called boy_touching. Maybe you should go back there." like astrokaiju, gryfindormia, and others, i took a look at the community and saw it was 18+, with no porn allowed. so that cancels out A's accusation that S was a pedophile. i interpreted a's tone as "go back to something lesser." that he was implying that being gay is something lesser. i hope that wording made sense.
2. both A and S were awesome posters. we know that. they will be missed. but just because you are a good poster does not give you the right to abuse another member. it doesn't give you the right to insult and lecture another member who has a differing opinion, or posted something you don't like.
it really, really disgusted me going through those entries and comments.
i am thinking of placing a temporary ban, but i'm still playing with it. if this happens, both A and S would be re-instated, to be completely fair.
i just want this to be a safe, considerate, and comfortable community where people can post without being scared they'll be attacked/flamed.
again, sorry for sounding so bitter and cranky. i used italics a lot. dumb me. i'm really tired. some sentences may have come out wrongly-worded. i'm going to bed.
i'm just going to shorten names to A and S, because we know them already
1. A's comment - "I can't help but notice you belong to an LJ community called boy_touching. Maybe you should go back there." like astrokaiju, gryfindormia, and others, i took a look at the community and saw it was 18+, with no porn allowed. so that cancels out A's accusation that S was a pedophile. i interpreted a's tone as "go back to something lesser." that he was implying that being gay is something lesser. i hope that wording made sense.
2. both A and S were awesome posters. we know that. they will be missed. but just because you are a good poster does not give you the right to abuse another member. it doesn't give you the right to insult and lecture another member who has a differing opinion, or posted something you don't like.
it really, really disgusted me going through those entries and comments.
i am thinking of placing a temporary ban, but i'm still playing with it. if this happens, both A and S would be re-instated, to be completely fair.
i just want this to be a safe, considerate, and comfortable community where people can post without being scared they'll be attacked/flamed.
again, sorry for sounding so bitter and cranky. i used italics a lot. dumb me. i'm really tired. some sentences may have come out wrongly-worded. i'm going to bed.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2008-03-15 02:51 am (UTC)(link)don't reinstate!
(Anonymous) 2008-03-15 02:53 am (UTC)(link)Re: don't reinstate!
(Anonymous) 2008-03-15 02:53 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
ontd
no subject
no subject
no subject
And I hope you reinstate, because I know certain people will just change their username/ get a new account and rejoin anyway. It has happened before in other communities. Maybe clearer rules in the use info would be good? That way if drama erupts again, there will be no confusion over why someone was banned.
no subject
It seems this community is getting popular/populous enough that it's attracting drama queens, and some ground rules about acceptable behavior need to be established. A good, clear set of rules will also help loyal comm members self-regulate if the mod can't be around all the time.
fwiw,
no subject
no subject
http://community.livejournal.com/vintage_ads/894264.html?thread=6634552#t6634552
no subject
They've already deleted it, who was it & what did it say?
no subject
Their reply was:
IF NOT THIS INSANELY OFFENSIVE COMMENT DOESN'T RESULT IN A BAN, I WILL
PERSONALLY REPORT THIS TO THE LJ ABUSE TEAM, AND REQUEST HIS JOURNAL BE
DELETED. JESUS!!!
AND SINCE WHEN DID THE GARBAGE SHITTY STUPID_FREE VULTURE SITE ACTUALLY
ACQUIRE ANY CREDIBILITY AT ALL? IT SPEAKS VOLUMES ABOUT THIS POSTER THAT
HE READS AND BELIEVES THE MALICIOUS CRAP TO BE FOUND THERE. AND IF YOU
ARE NOT A (FAT) FAGGOT - WHY THE HELL DO YOU LIST ROCKY HORROR AS ONE OF
YOUR PRINCIPAL INTERESTS - YOU ARE ALSO ASSOCIATED WITH A BISEXUAL
COMMUNITY - AND YOU HAVE THE NERVE TO PASS JUDGMENT ON ME????
MIND YOU - THESE ARE NOT EMPTY THREATS - AND I HAVE ALREADY TAKEN
SCREENCAPS OF YOUR EXTREMELY OFFENSIVE POSTS - AS EVIDENCE TO LJ - SO YOU
BETTER COOK UP A NEW LJ, MISTER.
no subject
no subject
I don't think we can see every single comment that is posted in this community, but if you see something that we should take care of, please let us know.
no subject
I understand you three are doing the best you can and there's nothing you can do ultimately to stop the drama queen(s). Hopefully, eventually, they'll move on. my best to all of you.
(frozen comment) no subject
I think somber_sigh/nocturne333 needs to be ultra high super double secret perma banned from this community... from LJ... heck form the Internets if possible and their computer buried.
No, it doesn't need to be "fair" - it's not the same thing. somber_sigh/nocturne333 is a batshit insane lunatic with serious mental problems. His/her trolling and insane antics and drama queen idiocy across LJ are epic on
(frozen comment) no subject
no subject
When kids in the playground can't play nicely, they get sent away. You did the right thing for the good of the community.
Hooray for safe, considerate and comfortable!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2008-03-15 04:58 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
ditto
(Anonymous) 2008-03-15 06:39 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I think I understand where you (mermaidshotel) are coming from and don't envy you. Moderating this community is probably more work than you signed on for. I would volunteer to help but I have never contributed, so I think that rules me out.
no subject
no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
I can't so much speak for S since I only actively noticed two or three posts and then the massive wankery and flouncing, but in A's case I can say that there were many high quality posts that I enjoyed a lot. So yeah, whereas making good posts doesn't give you the right to be a constant raging idiot, it should give you a bit more lenience and consideration when being banned. It's like there's a huge long list of positive contributions as opposed to a few instances of negative ones, all related to a certain incident. That should be taken into account.
Of course it's your community and your decision and at least a temporary ban was a good idea, but I think eventually the decision should be reconsidered. Also, I think the accusation of the comment being homophobic is a bit over the top as well. It seems vasty based on personal interpretations IMO.
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2008-03-15 11:16 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
Just to clarify,not trying to restir the wank pot.
(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2008-03-15 11:18 am (UTC)(link)amadoj0nes
2008-03-15 01:06 am UTC (link)
I called the guy out on the fact he's a member of an LJ community called "boy_touching".
The mod here apparently considers pedophilia a homosexual thing, and therefore my comment is "homophobic" in nature.
Yeah, I know.
Hell, I didn't even know the guy was gay, assuming he even is! Silly me, I point out a pedo, and I get banned. :) What bothers me is that she apparently equates homosexuality with pedophilia. Thats kind of, uhm.. wrong? Massively wrong?
(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2008-03-15 11:27 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
Regardless, as I explained in my post above, I think evaluation needs to be made based on overall performance in a community as opposed to just looking at random comments made in anger as we all are prone to do at times. That includes all parties involved. I'm neither friend or foe of either one, I'm merely adding my opinion.
no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
http://community.livejournal.com/vintage_ads/894264.html?thread=6634552#t6634552
NOW do you guys see why it's a mistake to let crazy people back in. Just like I told you.